67 – The Sea of Faith: 20 Years On

Editorial

Guest Editorial Ronald Pearse For those of us who were adults half a century ago, the year 1984 had ominous advance overtones that lasted for many years. | 984 was the title of George Orwell’s famous futuristic novel depicting the ultimate in state control of all aspects of life, based on a political philosophy of a Soviet flavour When the year 1984 came, those overtones had faded.

During the summer of that year I was eagerly awaiting the autumn broadcast of Don Cupitt’s TV series The Sea of Faith.

I was not disappointed. The series, with his book of the same title, provided a panoramic historical view of the evolution of the Christian faith, using the rational tools of the scientific method and modern historical examination.

It enabled me to gain a wider perspective of faith, compared with the emotionally and aesthetically attractive, but benignly authoritarian, interpretation of Christianity of my youth. It was for me a stage on the progress of my achieving integration of tradition and rationality — from Galileo to Jung - in an acceptable way.

As the presenter and author makes clear in his book, TSOF was not just one man’s work. He paid tribute to the skills of the series’ chief instigator and producer, Peter Armstrong and many others. Without the beauty that was created, visually and audibly, in each of the six programmes, the ideas they conveyed would not have spoken so clearly and effectively to the wide viewing public that the series reached.

The first scene was Dover Beach, with the words of Matthew Arnold’s now famous poem about the ‘melancholy, long, withdrawing roar’ of the retreating sea | am a priest in the Church of England lecturers. In the early days we invited scholars from home and abroad, with no fee offered and no promise of travelling expenses (but we provided free accommodation!).

Several, including from the USA, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand, came, very nobly, on those terms.

These included Lloyd Geering from New Zealand, whose book Faith’s New Age (later re-issued as Christian Faith at the Crossroads) is listed in TSOF as being among Cupitt’s sources for his book and series. On returning home, Geering set up the Sea of Faith Network (NZ), which continues to prosper after a rapid early rate of growth.

More recently SoFiA has been started by Greg Spearitt and others in Australia, and is prospering there. Readers of the SoF Magazine and individual overseas members in the USA of SoFN(UK) are slowly increasing in numbers.

Although what became the first SoF conference, in response to TSOF, was addressed primarily to radical Christians it soon became clear that a wider spectrum of people was interested. At one time it was thought that the Network’s membership could be classified as made up of ‘Church’, ‘ex-Church’ and ‘non-Church’. I think we have all benefited, in whatever bracket, from the presence and contributions of those in the other two.

We have long been aware of the desirability (David Paterson would say the necessity) of thinking more broadly than within the Christian faith tradition, but except for some Buddhist practitioners or of faith. The series ended back on that beach with Don amongst television equipment, saying, ‘I am a priest in the Church of England ...’ and ‘We have finished now. It’s over to you.’ That was easier said than done. What could individual viewers do to spread the enlightenment offered in the programmes? I wrote to Don and found that a few other priests were doing so. He put me in touch with one, local to me. We met and were joined by three others, for pub lunch discussions.

We hoped for a national conference of like-minded people. After much delay our pub-lunch group organised such an event - in Loughborough in 1988 - and had the promise of Don’s presence throughout. One conference led to another: this year’s conference was number 17.

The TSOF background and its presenter’s fame /notoriety made it easy to attract both attendees and sympathisers, the membership seems not to show much representation of people other than those from a culturally Christian background.

Twenty years after TSOF, and with the series now available on DVD in the SoF Network (within strict limits, for copyright reasons), we have opportunity to pause, reflect and review our strategy as people convinced of the value of a reasonable religious faith. sof 67 September 2004 An unhappy and suffering world needs something better than the lust for certainty (and power) that fundamentalists of whatever flavour encourage.

The political alarm that 1984 expressed passed with the end of the USSR, but a religious totalitarianism now threatens the world in a way that could not be imagined half a century ago. In the UK we are led by one whose messianic self-assurance and apparent lack of historical knowledge and effective self-criticism (the latter long a part of Christian spirituality) has led us, with the support of a supine parliament, to become accomplices of a country set on world domination based on economic greed and religious fanaticism.

Evil often results from good men and women doing nothing. With notable individual exceptions the Christian churches seem to be doing little to combat the fundamentalist theological views that seep out of a USA that seems hell-bent on destroying the world by demonising Islam and so inciting a cataclysmic clash of opposites. (By contrast, the Church of England’s General Synod recently passed a resolution criticising Royal Mail’s designs for postage stamps at Christmas — and only narrowly defeated a move that could have imposed theological censorship on the clergy!) What can good men and women who have been inspired by TSOF or by subsequent publications of similar outlook do to ensure that rationality and faith are not seen as incompatible? Some who keep their loyalty to the Churches sometimes feel isolated and ostracised. I know: they write to me about it. But some others find a quiet acceptance.

The Sea of Faith Networks have had some achievements in fifteen years. George Bush’s bellicose attitudes seem to achieve instant effect. We may need to be more patient, although time is not on the side of our planet’s survival.

Ecological disasters don’t wait for us to change our habits.

It is often a slow progress towards wholeness and balance that individuals, and perhaps communities, make.

We all have opposite and, potentially complementary, traits in our psychological make-up. Psychotherapy aims to give them balance and to make us whole, but it can take time.

Interestingly, Jung observed that many of his patients found that a mature religious faith was a long-term fruit of their therapy.

The policy-and-task-setting meeting of October 1989 decided the Network's statement of purpose, which remains unchanged as ‘exploring and promoting religious faith as a human creation’. It deliberately says nothing for or against the concept of God.

The Magazine started in 1990 by the enterprise of its first editor, Clive Richards, and was then intended for circulation within the membership only. When he emigrated to the USA, a new member, David Boulton, was recruited as editor, followed for a spell by Anthony Freeman. In a later period of David's editorship, the magazine was professionally designed and eventually increased its appearances to six issues a year, a situation maintained by the most recent editor, Paul Overend. For speedier communication within the Network, a photocopied and occasional newsletter was established quite early and then upgraded as the two-monthly Portholes by Stephen Mitchell, followed by Peter Fisher and now Patti Whaley as editors.

A more formal constitution for the Network was adopted by its AGM in 1994 and slightly revised in 1997.

The business of the Network is carried on between AGMs by an elected steering committee which has been chaired successively by Aileen LaTourette, Maxine Green, Stephen sof 67 September 2004 Warnes, Stephen Mitchell and Patti Whaley, all of whose wisdom and increasingly heavy workload have been invaluable in the Network.

As a limited-term project, the educational work of the network was developed by the appointment of Michael Elliott, which resulted in the creation of a teaching course, Sea Change.

The first conference, and then the Network, grew out of a small local group and so it is not surprising that local SoF groups developed and now number 28 across the UK.

These have benefited by wise guidance and support from Helen Fisher, Penny Mawdsley and now Christine Dyer, as co-ordinators.

Also, a special-interest group, Sea of Faith in the Churches (originally Church Members in Sea of Faith) has developed, with now an annual gathering in Loughborough. It arose from organising protests about the dismissal of Anthony Freeman from his parish for publishing a book God in Us. ; The Network has offered public support to others experiencing ecclesiastical pressure as a result of their expressing interpretations of their faith somewhat in advance of those of their superiors.

A letter of protest went to the Cardinal Archbishop of Paris against the dismissal of Jacques Gaillot as Bishop of Evreux for the latter’s support of gay priests. Our protest was one among about 42,000 others!

After Andrew Furlong’s resignation (as Dean of Clonmacnoise in Ireland) under threat of a heresy trial, and after Jeffrey John withdrew, under pressure, from appointment as a bishop, because of his gay (but celibate) lifestyle and his publicly held views about gay priests, the SoF AGM resolved that alertness should be maintained and there should be public outspokenness on behalf of the Network on issues affecting religious life.

This has resulted in some recent action to lobby General Synod members against the proposed strengthening of Church of England law about heresy trials. The motion in favour of the strengthening was lost in Synod by only four votes.

Recently, SoF set up a study group on the theme of Diversity in Doctrine and resulting material from it was published in a special edition of the SOF Magazine.

The Network has also undertaken a number of publications, including the symposia This Is My Story and Time and Tide.

The programmes and book of 1984 have been followed up in some degree. Much remains to be done.

Ronald Pearse is a founding member of the SoF Network.

Oliver Essame Letters’ Editor SOF Gospel Hill Cottage, decomposition poisons the world. In this metaphor, Chapel Lane, Whitfield, drawn from Nietzsche, the corpse stands not only Brackley NN!3 5TF for God, but for the correspondence theory of truth, e-mail to oliver@essame.clara.net an idea equally poisonous to humanity.

Peter Lumsden Keith Ward accepts the correspondence theory of truth and 23D South Villas Don Cupitt doesn’t — or so I understand from their stimulating London NW1 9BT debate at the Sea of Faith 2004 conference — and this led me to realise that this difference is reflected in everyday life; if you say to someone “You're wrong”, you agree with Keith; but if you say “I disagree with you”, you are in the camp of Cupitt.

Put like this, one can see which is preferable, if only on the level of politeness! Keith could be described as aggressive, while Don is assertive, and ‘up to a point, Lord Copper’ could: be seen as submissive. More seriously, one can see how the correspondence theory of truth legitimised all fundamentalism.

— Peter Lumsden, London

Our present situation could be compared to that of an elderly, isolated couple, one of whom is terminally ill; a fact denied by both. He (or she) dies, a fact denied by the other, who attempts to feed and care for the rotting corpse while its 21 S of 67 September 2004 ———————— I refer to the letter from Andrew Furlong (Postbag SOF 65) regarding Don Cupitt’s book Life, Life. Andrew contrasts Don's tone of ‘resignation’ with the ‘spirit of defiance’ aroused in us by injustice. I feel that Andrew’s criticism brings into focus the prevailing confusion between ethical commitment and religious attitude. Ethical commitment does involve fighting for justice and a ‘spirit of defiance’ in the face of suffering, but it is not the monopoly of religion. A religious attitude involves openness to the will of God and a spirit of gratitude even in the face of suffering. From an ethical point of view, all is conflict; from a religious point of view, all is grace.

The confusion of ethics and religion is both understandable and dangerous. Certainly, as religion becomes less attractive, so ethics is called in to bolster its relevance. But religion without ethics leads to fundamentalism at one extreme, quietism at the other. Ethics without religion can become arid humanism. Only if ethics and religion are kept separate can we account for the two aspects of our being which were respectively called our humanity and our divinity before the difference collapsed and which together can still help us to articulate the fullest sense of our possibilities.

Both aspects are preserved in the traditional religious life, which considers equally important access through the liturgy to the kingdom of heaven and involvement via the community in everyday life. The sacred liturgy reconciles us with God and with others; the accent is on forgiveness for sins past. Secular everyday life, on the other hand, is a struggle to change social and political structures; the accent is on constructing the future. While liturgy means being receptive to the divine voice and becoming inwardly transformed, life in the community means dialogue with others and transforming the external environment together. Our life in the world should, as Andrew puts it, ‘stir up feelings of outrage’; so we engage in rational argument and try to make the world a better place. But feelings of outrage are all too ephemeral and rational discourse has little power to move the soul. Ethics requires the emotional charge provided by imaginative participation in a religious mythology. Prosaic action in the world requires the movement of poetry in the soul to sustain it.

The Eucharist is particularly well designed to achieve this as it both heals the wounds suffered in the external world and empowers us to change that world: both to hear God's voice and to do his will. First it absorbs us into Christ's story, through which we are divinely re-written; then we are sent out to write our own story, extending the passion narrative into the here and now. Understood in this way, the liturgy keeps us at the cusp of past and future, sustained by Christ’s example yet called to take the initiative, avoiding the extremes of ‘inane complacency’ which Dinah Livingstone finds in Cupitt and the over-ambitious activism to which Andrew Furlong’s ‘deep ethical commitment’ can lead.

We find both aspects in the life of Christ. At one point he speaks of sons being set against their fathers in his name; but he the Son was loyal to his Father to the bitter end. He was moved by anger to chase the money changers out of the Temple; but another time he simply drew in the sand and waited for the would-be judges to judge their own unworthiness. There is a need for both action and contemplation in our lives; keeping ethics and religion separate will help us do justice to them both.

Jonathan Smith 10 Moultrie Road Rugby CV21 3BD Richard Boeke (An Introduction to The World's Religions and its author, Huston Smith. SOF 64) highlights Huston Smith's view that the community today can be no single tradition but rather the planet, and that we must listen in order to speak. He wants us to move from individual learning to that of the community through the creative interchange of mutual listening and widening of our perceptions. This way he seeks extended vision, integration and the highest common denominator. Hope is built into reality.

— Jonathan Smith, Rugby

I agree with most of this. Nevertheless, | wish to draw a distinction between what I call religion and what I call Sof 67 September 2004 spirituality. The highest common denominator is spirituality. Hope comes because out of the cycle of creativity (and the cleansing of destruction) is spirituality.

It is as if the universe is at work, towards, in the end, common purposes that are at least compatible (if not coherent), just as we in human communities can, through all our differences, seek common purposes.

Spirituality is what is vital and ethical, and the root is the creative urge in the web of existence including humankind (high examples are Rembrandt and Beethoven).

However, there is much in religion that should be cut out. After listening, there is often the need to say no.

Religions themselves will not produce the highest common denominator. To achieve spirituality areas of disagreement must be reduced, if possible. Therefore I believe we need to go a little further than Huston Smith does.

I would add that I think Huston Smith's approach (as reported) is a much more fruitful direction than that of Don Cupitt's listening to everyday speech, which seems to lack any ethical discernment and cutting out the bad from the good, and ignores the need for a global ethic.

David Strachan david@davstrac.freeserve.co.uk In reading the latest Flotsam and Jetsam piece "Apologies to Americans” (SOF 66) I was rather puzzled with how this "apology" turned into another soapbox to denounce American foreign policy. My concern is not with the accusations ("the truth hurts" as the saying goes). Rather, I was appalled with the selfrighteous tone of the piece, given that it comes from a British publication.

— David Strachan

Britain and America both share responsibility for many global issues. After all, it was British policy, not American, which promised the same piece of land to both Jews and Arabs, setting the stage for the current Israeli-Palestinian turmoil. It was British policy that helped set up the artificial state of Iraq and ensured Hashemite rule over that state as well as in Saudi Arabia The early oil exploration of the region took place under British auspices.

That racism is a sad legacy of the United States is a given.

Let's not forget, however, the racism behind establishing colonies in Africa and Asia, creating artificial boundaries that divided peoples and joining long-standing enemies under the same government — without those peoples being consulted in the matter. I find it hard to believe that racism is not an issue in Britain as well, with immigration from all over the world bringing diverse populations into the United Kingdom. After all, in Australia and South Africa, parts of the British Empire and members of the Commonwealth, the indigenous peoples were denied even basic human rights and the Apartheid policy came into being. In many cases, these atrocities took place as British leaders and thinkers gloated on how the wonders of British "civilization" were being brought to backward peoples in an Empire on which the sun supposedly never set. While not denying the accusations against U.S. policy, I believe the old saying about people in glasshouses not throwing stones is also appropriate.

Jay M. Price Wichita, Kansas, USA Looking after SoF Local Groups At my first — the first - Sea of Faith conference it was the people who enthralled me as much as the debates.

— Jay M. Price, Wichita, Kansas, USA