124 – The Necessity of Poetry

Contents

Editorial

  • The Necessity of Poetry

Articles

Poetry

Reviews

Regulars and Occasionals

Sofia 124 front cover
Sofia 124 back cover

Editorial: The Necessity of Poetry

The SOF London Conference entitled In the Beginning was the Word: Religion as Poetry and Story? took place on March 25th in St John’s Church, Waterloo. This Sofia issue begins with the talk given at it by Mark Oakley, Canon Chancellor of St Paul’s Cathedral in London. He began his talk by addressing people who are wary of poetry:

I know that the word poetry is scary for a lot of people because it can have bad memories of boredom or humiliation at school as you tried to understand or recite a poem, and sometimes then maybe you’ve tried to come back to poetry in later life but don’t know quite where to start and when you did it all seemed pretty incomprehensible.

He compared poetry to a trip to a foreign country, say, Belgium: ‘You’d know when you get to Belgium you were going to be confused, or at least occasionally at a loss, and you’d accept that confusion as part of the experience.’ That is rather like the poet Brecht’s Verfremdung – we could roughly translate it as ‘the shock of the strange’ – which can be part of the pleasure. The poet Wordsworth says: ‘The end of poetry is to produce excitement in coexistence with an overbalance of pleasure.’ Indeed, small children take huge pleasure in poems and understand metaphor at once. That also goes for the birth of our species. Martin Spence’s article ‘Language and Faith’ discusses how we humans used symbols from the very beginning. I went into an infants’ school and one of the poems we read began:

There was a lady loved a swine.
'Honey,' said she.
'Pig hog, will you be mine?'
'Oink!' said he.

We divided the class into two groups, one saying the lady’s words and one the swine’s (of course, everyone wanted to be the swine and grunt). But the children immediately got the message that you can’t force someone to be your friend.

My four-year-old grandson adored reciting a poem like ‘Drake’s Drum’ – a terrific poem about memory – with all the actions:

Yonder looms the island, [points]
yonder lie the ships, [points the other way]
with sailor lads a-dancing heel and toe [jumps up and does a little dance]
and the shore lights flashing, [hand flashes]
and the night tide dashing. [hand dashes]
He sees it all so plainly as he saw it long ago.

That boy is now a cool twelve-year-old and when, as I am wont to do, I burbled some poem, he groaned and said: ‘You must admit, Gran Dinah, you are pretty embarrassing for a kid!’

Perhaps adults who become wary of poetry, or indeed fanatical poeticophobes, never get over their adolescent embarrassment or even, as Oakley puts it, become ‘cursed with literalism, simmering down the richness, the ambiguities, the resonances into something black and white and then often weaponised.’ So to enter into the richness, life more abundantly, requires both a growth out of adolescent hang-ups and a recovery of the joys of early childhood. Poetry is not only an adventure into a strange land but also a homecoming. The language we learn as our mother tongue is poetic from the start, replete with symbolism. We are not only rational animals (or aspire to be) but poetic animals (and need to be). That is the kind of animal we are.

As Thomas Aquinas put it: ‘Grace does not destroy nature but perfects it.’ Likewise, poetry is not an unnatural or alien language but a richer one, our everyday language enriched. William Blake was firmly rooted in the English dissenting tradition and is buried in the Dissenters’ Burial Ground, Bunhill Fields (in his Witness against the Beast E. P. Thompson suggests that Blake’s mother may have been a Muggletonian). In Blake’s poem Jerusalem:

The Fields from Islington to Marybone,
To Primrose Hill and St John's Wood,
Were builded over with pillars of gold
And there Jerusalem's pillars stood.

The New Jerusalem, the beautiful city of kindness, is not somewhere else, up in the sky, but here where we are in our own London transformed. That is why the poet lists all those familiar London names. So here Blake’s theology is very Thomist: grace does not destroy nature but perfects it. Likewise, poetry is grace.

Salley Vickers was ill and unable to speak at the SOF London Conference but Janet Seargeant read out her script. Salley has asked for publication of her talk to be delayed and it will be published in the September or Christmas Sofia. It is well worth waiting for.

Dinah Livingstone

Letters to the Editor

Zero-hours Contracts

The gig economy: a labour market characterised by the prevalence of short-term – pejoratively known as ‘zero-hours’ – contracts or freelance work as opposed to permanent jobs. In St Paul’s words to the Galatians (5.1): ‘Be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.’ But bondage by whom? Those who seek to compel, in pursuit of their own greed, free working people to work as latter-day wage slaves in a precarious, soul-destroying existence. Or those who wish to deny such flexible opportunities for work; opportunities created by the advance of IT and by innovative contractual arrangements, perhaps unorthodox by old-fashioned standards, but freely entered into by two consenting parties. The former are being steadily driven out by the activities of such as the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) as set out below. The latter – represented by the article As I Please (Sofia 123) – seem determined to pursue a reactionary (as the OED definition) agenda.

Indeed, Mr Pearson’s article reads far more as a Luddite polemic than reasoned argument; a pity because there are some valid aspects which require to be addressed. The CIPD has just (17th March) released its latest report To gig or not to gig? and sets out (p. 51) a Summary of Recommendations to address the shortcomings of the system. It does, however, state in its Conclusions (pp. 46-48) that ‘For many people, working in the gig economy is a positive choice rather than a last-resort option in lieu of not being able to find more traditional employment.’

I use the term ‘Luddite polemic’ above quite deliberately; ‘Luddite’ as an attempt to destroy a natural process of evolving working patterns and ‘polemic’ concurring as I do with John Stuart Mill’s opinion that: ‘The worst offence that can be committed by a polemic is to stigmatise those who hold a contrary opinion as bad and immoral men.’ Whilst there are many aspects of society today that are profoundly unsatisfactory and can and should be properly addressed in Sofia, I cannot support such overtly political offerings as As I Please.

Richard Wood-Penn, Northampton