142 – Making Sense

Contents

Editorial
  • Making Sense
Articles
Poetry
Reviews
Regulars and Occasionals
Front cover of Sofia issue 142 - Making Sense
Back cover of Sofia issue 142 - Making Sense

Editorial: Making Sense

‘Making Sense’, the title of this issue of Sofia, ranges from seeking, to seeing to doing. It covers trying to understand or interpret, arrange coherently, or it may mean something is reasonable, is the right action to take. We might say: ‘I am trying to make sense of this happening/text.’ Or ‘Now I see’. Or ‘That makes sense. It is the right thing to do.’

This Sofia has a wide range of articles relating to the theme. Digby Hartridge begins our first one: ‘In my eightieth year in the middle of a pandemic, what I always thought to be my duty, to make sense of existence, took on a new urgency.’ He goes on to try to make sense of his own life and of the world in which we are living now. ‘By chance,’ he says, ‘I was born during the Second World War into a privileged ruling class and into a land isolated from the worst of the hostilities, Southern Rhodesia.’ He studied Social Anthropology at university, disagreed with the ruling white majority but found he could make ‘little difference by arguing with my contemporaries’. He is suddenly reminded of the feeling of helplessness he felt then when facing the urgent questions of today when ‘climate change dominates intelligent discourse’, and most of us may acknowledge capitalism’s excesses but ‘do all of us not satisfy ourselves with half measures?’

In our second article Martin Spence, who led the discussion at the SOF Annual Zoom Conference on Terry Eagleton’s talk on the Death of God, gives his own response to Eagleton. He argues that our humanity ‘expresses itself as a transcendent impulse, an ever-present urge to reach out for meaning beyond the immediacy of daily life’. So religion, ‘far from being the source of transcendent value is a particular form of response’ to that human urge.

In our third piece David Rhodes offers some comments on the assertion: ‘We created religion to explain stuff we didn’t understand’. That is followed by David Lambourn’s ‘Letter to Mark’, which asks about the meaning (intention and interpretation) of Mark’s Gospel. He also gives ‘Mark’s reply’. Then Frank Walker writes about ‘Horror and Hope at Christmas’.

Kathryn Southworth revisits The Portrait of a Lady by Henry James. The final episode of the BBC dramatisation of the novel was broadcast in 1968, when Kathryn became sixteen. She says 1968 was an annus mirabilis, a year of choices and intense experiences. ‘How could a young woman not identify with [the heroine] Isobel Archer’s sense of herself as “someone in particular”, a work in progress, and with her zest to explore the world and all its possibilities?’

There are the usual letters, reviews and John Pearson’s As I Please, this time on ‘Bucket Lists’. In this issue we are particularly privileged to have an extended review by Keith Sutherland, the founder and director of Imprint Academic, Sofia’s consistently excellent, long-term printer. Sutherland’s review is of a new book by John Higgs: William Blake vs the World. Like Sutherland, Blake himself, of course, was a printer.

What Eagleton and Spence refer to as transcendence relates closely to what Blake calls the Poetic Genius (and also to what his contemporary Coleridge calls ‘the shaping spirit of imagination’). Blake believed ‘all deities reside in the human breast’ and concludes his piece All Religions are One: The Voice of one crying in the Wilderness: ‘As all men are alike (though infinitely various), so all religions and, as all similars, have one source. The true Man is the source, he being the Poetic Genius.’

The ‘most high’ belongs to the realm of the human Poetic Genius or imagination. The very first O antiphon invokes Wisdom (Sapientia/Sofia): ‘O Wisdom, proceeding from the mouth of the most high, reaching from end to end, arranging everything strongly and sweetly, Come and teach us to have good sense.’

Dinah Livingstone

Letters to the Editor

The Future of God and Organised Religion

I have just read John Pearson’s article. So much of what he has to say rings true. I don’t give the Established Church anywhere near as long as 150 years; divide by ten and you are nearer the truth. That is the average length of time that us churchgoers have left! The Established Church as we know it will soon implode. I detect in John a good Christian who, like so many of us, are weary of the efforts that we have made to bring about change for the better in our various Christian churches. However, I am not so pessimistic.

The seeds of change have been sown. People like Don Cupitt have been busy dedicating their lives to preparing the soil. I am sure that John is also one of them. Jesus faced the same difficulties and frustrations and ended up feeling forsaken. I turn to the stars at night; I think of the oceans of human compassion; I look at the purposeful ways that ordinary people live their lives; and, I can’t help feeling that there is meaning and purpose behind it all. It is as though it is written into our very DNA. The very fact of our awareness of everything is, itself, mind-blowing. The answer lies, for me, in helping others to see that life is a consequence of love and not belief.

As Samuel Taylor Coleridge (our local poet) once said, it is a question of trying it and seeing if it works. The man-made structures of religion, I guess, will all come crashing down but, hopefully, in their place will emerge communities of compassion and love; even the Bible speaks of God as love. I recall Karen Armstrong writing that the basis of all the major religions is compassion. Thank-you John for being so honest; it always pays but it can be hard!

Grenville Gilbert, Ottery St Mary, Devon

In his letter in Sofia 141, Jerry Peyton drew attention to my hypothesis in my conference talk that The Network sensibly has a future life of only ten years… something I also alluded to in Portholes 164. Jerry asks me to account for myself.

My fear is indeed driven by my vision of its practical sustainability, rather than a denial of its worth. Those who have kept it going this far, and still do in some cases, are a small and ageing body. No names or pack drill, but most of these persons will be over 80, over 90 even, ten years from now. I suggest, quite simply, that without an intake of dedicated Trustees (and/or members) currently in their fifties and sixties (younger if possible) the thing just can’t go on for ever – and membership numbers generally are in decline.

More worthy of discussion perhaps is how we should manage our departure? I suggested a pretty specific timescale because this might focus the mind, allowing for planning. We have reserve funds via our investments, seldom used (a long-standing bugbear of mine). I fear that when the time comes we shall suddenly seize up, relatively cash-rich but with little support and no sensible direction or purpose any more.

My suggestion therefore would be a graceful, measured retreat, cementing our legacy for the future: carefully investing in promising ventures such as Sofia, Solarity, new publications which bring together new and existing writings epitomising the ideals of the Network, and nine more stimulating Annual Conferences (regional ones too if we can muster the support), plus more editions of Sofia. If adopted, the above would mean a lot of work. We need you, out there, to help us do it. Will you?

John Pearson, Newcastle upon Tyne